Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

How a Trip to the Vet Made Me a Better Doc

Bharat Kumar, MD, MME, FACP, FAAAAI, RhMSUS  |  Issue: March 2023  |  March 10, 2023

Social History 1st

Humans & dogs are social animals, so social history should come first.

After a few minutes—and a few doggie treats that calmed down little Lexi, the veterinarian—let’s call her Dr. N—entered the room. She said a few words to say hello and got straight to work looking at the chart in the computer and the questionnaire. I was struck by the quick pace of everything before she turned around to me and began asking me the customary questions. To tell you the truth, I was skeptical—would she go over the same things that I had just answered on the questionnaire?

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

No, Dr. N was wiser than that. She started with, “How’s Stella doing?” Stella is our older pup, who, at that time, was around 6 years old. At first I thought it was a rapport-building question. Certainly the patient experience consultants who periodically come around to our clinics encourage us to ask questions like that to improve the clinic’s patient satisfaction numbers.

But she didn’t take “fine” as an answer. She dug in deeply: Does Stella have a limp? How does Stella play with Lexi? And so forth. It wasn’t just a pleasantry for patient satisfaction. Dr. N was very subtly taking a history while putting me at ease. Then she asked us about our kids and how Lexi interacts with the kids. Here, Dr. N wasn’t getting a social history for the sake of billing but was trying to put together a richer, more detailed picture of whether some external force had prompted Lexi’s limp.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

That was something new to me. In medical school and throughout postgraduate training, the typical structure of a clinic visit starts with a golden minute of small talk, followed by a direct inquiry into the chief complaint. Social history and other elements are expected to come later—but Dr. N flipped this entirely. She segued the golden minute into the social history and used that as the basis for understanding the chief complaint.

While I can’t imagine doing this on a first clinical consultation visit, I can surely imagine doing it on routine follow-ups. It makes complete sense to me to start off with how chronic diseases that involve lifestyles and social relationships impact patients’ social lives and how their social lives impact their disease activity.

The History

Only after getting the social history did Dr. N solicit the chief concern and inquire about the review of systems. This, I was pleasantly surprised, was pretty much the same as an encounter in the rheumatology clinic. She asked the five elements of pain (i.e., location, severity, duration, associated symptoms and modifying factors) and seemed to go from head to toe, probing for any further context. Yet there was an important difference between how she performed the review of systems and how I would in my clinic.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:OpinionPatient PerspectivePractice SupportRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:patient communication

Related Articles

    The Rheumatologist as Detective

    February 1, 2015

    A case of difficult-to-diagnose Whipple’s disease

    The Patient's Choice

    When Rheumatologists Are a Patient’s Second or Third Choice for Medical Opinion

    September 7, 2016

    Outside Exam Room No. 5, the chart rack was empty, so I assumed my new consult was late. Just in case, I looked back over my shoulder as I passed by the partially open door and glimpsed the lower half of a woman holding a three-ringed binder on her lap. I squinted and took a…

    The Role of Social Work in Patient-Centered Rheumatology Care

    December 1, 2013

    Social workers’ ability to build trusted relationships with patients helps enhance care coordination and can improve patient outcomes

    Rheumatologist Recalls Personal Experience with RA

    May 15, 2015

    In late March 2012, I awoke with pain in my left hand. I had difficulty moving my metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. They did not move smoothly, but clunked. As I repeatedly attempted to open and close my hand, I realized that I had morning stiffness. As the pain and stiffness gradually improved over the next hour,…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences