Video: Knock on Wood| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Lupus Nephritis
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

New Quality Measures Aim to Address Gaps & Inequities in Lupus Care

Leslie Mertz, PhD  |  February 19, 2024

Dr. Katz

Standardization of screening is important so that “everybody is using the same yardstick,” Dr. Katz says. Data collected in a consistent manner across EHRs and in the RISE registry can allow for rigorous research into not only the effectiveness of different treatments, but also possible disparities in treatments or outcomes, which can then enable building policies to address them.

The work group is now running a small pilot of the depression and physical function screenings, Dr. Katz says. “We have five test practices participating, and we’ll be having conversations soon to see how the screenings are working and whether the practices find the data of value. This is the information we need so we can make adjustments and, eventually, make the bigger effort to roll this out nationally.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The pilot study will also explore whether rheumatology practices are comfortable conducting the screenings in routine care. For example, Dr. Yazdany says, rheumatologists often feel screening for depression is better relegated to the primary care setting. The patient advisory group, however, was adamant that rheumatologists are better equipped in that arena because they understand the struggles of lupus patients far better than do primary care doctors, who may only care for one lupus patient.

A further step will be to conduct a pilot study to delve into how rheumatologists may use the results of depression assessments. “Do they refer patients back to their family care doctor? Do they deal with a high score on a depression assessment themselves? Do they provide resources to the patients? This is not a trivial thing,” Dr. Yazdany remarks. “We need to figure out what to do with the information, and this is another area where our five pilot practices will help.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The screenings are vital, Dr. Katz says. “Most of the clinical measures of lupus are really physician facing; these assessments give the patients the opportunity, in a standardized way, to express how they’re doing and bring [their] voice into regular lupus monitoring, [as well as] opens the door to support for depression or physical function, if needed. Beyond that, it also gives the patients tools to monitor themselves over time and, overall, gives them more agency in a clinical setting.”

Once the PRO work group has data from the pilot practices, it also hopes to begin building these measures into the RISE registry. “All of this work will be completed in the next two years, by the end of the grant,” Dr. Yazdany says. “It’s an ambitious project, but a really important one.”

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Information TechnologyQuality Assurance/ImprovementSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:Quality MeasuresRheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE) RegistrySLE Resource Center

Related Articles

    7 Tools to Identify Depression

    August 1, 2014

    Why screening for depressive symptoms in patients with arthritis is needed

    Depression in Rheumatoid Arthritis

    November 1, 2012

    Examining the psychological and health-related comorbidities of rheumatoid arthritis patients with depression

    The RISE Registry Delivers Practice-Based Evidence to Rheumatologists

    April 15, 2019

    The advent of quality-based healthcare, such as the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA), requires rheumatology professionals to demonstrate their practice is based on interventions supported by the best available evidence and that their practice, in turn, provides quality care. These requirements have increased the need for methods to measure and quantify…

    Using RISE Data in Research

    October 17, 2019

    The ACR’s RISE registry offers answers on real-world experience to researchers.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences